Tree removal permit rules: Federal Way vs Kent, Washington

A side-by-side comparison drawn from each city's tree-protection ordinance. For the underlying full ordinance text, see the Federal Way ordinance page or the Kent ordinance page.

Side-by-side comparison

Field Federal Way Kent
Protected tree definition Significant tree: 6+ inches DBH. Tree retention required during development per tree units per acre standard. Landmark trees receive enhanced protection. Significant tree: 6+ inches DBH. Tree retention required during development. Landmark trees designated separately for exceptional significance.
Heritage / landmark trees Landmark trees designated for exceptional size, species, age, or community value. Landmark trees designated for exceptional size, species, age, or historical significance.
Who can apply Property owner or authorized agent with arborist report Property owner or authorized agent with arborist report
Replacement ratio Based on tree unit standard per acre and replacement schedule Based on retention percentage; on-site replacement preferred
Replacement details On-site replacement to meet tree unit standard; fee-in-lieu when infeasible. On-site replacement preferred; fee-in-lieu paid to tree fund when infeasible.
Typical processing time 4-6 weeks 4-6 weeks
Permit fee Not documented Not documented
Permitting department Community Development Economic and Community Development
Municipal code View ordinance → View ordinance →

How they differ

Which city has stricter heritage tree protections, Federal Way or Kent?
Both Federal Way and Kent maintain heritage / landmark tree designations. Federal Way: Landmark trees designated for exceptional size, species, age, or community value. Kent: Landmark trees designated for exceptional size, species, age, or historical significance.
Where is a tree removal permit processed faster, Federal Way or Kent?
Federal Way publishes a typical processing time of 4-6 weeks; Kent publishes 4-6 weeks. Compare each city's published timeline and plan removal accordingly — emergency-tree provisions may shorten the wait in either city.
Where are tree replacement obligations heavier, Federal Way or Kent?
Federal Way requires a replacement ratio of Based on tree unit standard per acre and replacement schedule. Kent requires a replacement ratio of Based on retention percentage; on-site replacement preferred. Federal Way: On-site replacement to meet tree unit standard; fee-in-lieu when infeasible. Kent: On-site replacement preferred; fee-in-lieu paid to tree fund when infeasible.

Filing in Federal Way or Kent?

Capture an ISA TRAQ Level 1, 2, or 3 assessment in the field and export a municipality-ready PDF that fits each city's required report sections. Free, no account required.

Start a TRAQ assessment