Tree removal permit rules: Everett vs Kent, Washington
A side-by-side comparison drawn from each city's tree-protection ordinance. For the underlying full ordinance text, see the Everett ordinance page or the Kent ordinance page.
Side-by-side comparison
| Field | Everett | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Protected tree definition | Significant tree: 6+ inches DBH. Tree preservation and replacement required during development per landscaping code. | Significant tree: 6+ inches DBH. Tree retention required during development. Landmark trees designated separately for exceptional significance. |
| Heritage / landmark trees | Not documented | Landmark trees designated for exceptional size, species, age, or historical significance. |
| Who can apply | Property owner or authorized agent with arborist report | Property owner or authorized agent with arborist report |
| Replacement ratio | Based on retention percentage and tree unit standard | Based on retention percentage; on-site replacement preferred |
| Replacement details | On-site replacement preferred; fee-in-lieu when infeasible. | On-site replacement preferred; fee-in-lieu paid to tree fund when infeasible. |
| Typical processing time | 4-6 weeks | 4-6 weeks |
| Permit fee | Not documented | Not documented |
| Permitting department | Planning and Community Development | Economic and Community Development |
| Municipal code | View ordinance → | View ordinance → |
How they differ
- Which city has stricter heritage tree protections, Everett or Kent?
- Kent has a heritage tree program (Landmark trees designated for exceptional size, species, age, or historical significance.). Everett does not document a heritage / landmark designation in its ordinance, so heritage protections are stricter in Kent.
- Where is a tree removal permit processed faster, Everett or Kent?
- Everett publishes a typical processing time of 4-6 weeks; Kent publishes 4-6 weeks. Compare each city's published timeline and plan removal accordingly — emergency-tree provisions may shorten the wait in either city.
- Where are tree replacement obligations heavier, Everett or Kent?
- Everett requires a replacement ratio of Based on retention percentage and tree unit standard. Kent requires a replacement ratio of Based on retention percentage; on-site replacement preferred. Everett: On-site replacement preferred; fee-in-lieu when infeasible. Kent: On-site replacement preferred; fee-in-lieu paid to tree fund when infeasible.
Everett next steps
Kent next steps
Filing in Everett or Kent?
Capture an ISA TRAQ Level 1, 2, or 3 assessment in the field and export a municipality-ready PDF that fits each city's required report sections. Free, no account required.
Start a TRAQ assessment