Tree removal permit rules: Garland vs Houston, Texas
A side-by-side comparison drawn from each city's tree-protection ordinance. For the underlying full ordinance text, see the Garland ordinance page or the Houston ordinance page.
Side-by-side comparison
| Field | Garland | Houston |
|---|---|---|
| Protected tree definition | Protected tree: 6 inches DBH or greater on commercial and multifamily development. Heritage trees (24+ inches DBH of qualifying species) receive enhanced protection. | Qualified tree: any living tree 6 inches DBH or greater on private development property. Trees in the public right-of-way are regulated regardless of size. |
| Heritage / landmark trees | Heritage trees: 24+ inches DBH of qualifying native species (post oak, live oak, pecan, cedar elm, bur oak, bald cypress). | Not documented |
| Who can apply | Property owner or authorized agent with arborist report | Property owner or authorized developer |
| Replacement ratio | Caliper-inch mitigation based on removed DBH | Based on caliper inches removed (site-specific) |
| Replacement details | On-site replacement preferred; payment to Tree Mitigation Fund when infeasible. | Trees replaced on-site or mitigation fees paid to Houston Parks Board Tree Mitigation Bank. |
| Typical processing time | 4-6 weeks | 3-6 weeks |
| Permit fee | Not documented | Not documented |
| Permitting department | Planning Department | Department of Planning & Development |
| Municipal code | View ordinance → | View ordinance → |
How they differ
- Which city has stricter heritage tree protections, Garland or Houston?
- Garland has a heritage tree program (Heritage trees: 24+ inches DBH of qualifying native species (post oak, live oak, pecan, cedar elm, bur oak, bald cypress).). Houston does not document a heritage / landmark designation in its ordinance, so heritage protections are stricter in Garland.
- Where is a tree removal permit processed faster, Garland or Houston?
- Garland publishes a typical processing time of 4-6 weeks; Houston publishes 3-6 weeks. Compare each city's published timeline and plan removal accordingly — emergency-tree provisions may shorten the wait in either city.
- Where are tree replacement obligations heavier, Garland or Houston?
- Garland requires a replacement ratio of Caliper-inch mitigation based on removed DBH. Houston requires a replacement ratio of Based on caliper inches removed (site-specific). Garland: On-site replacement preferred; payment to Tree Mitigation Fund when infeasible. Houston: Trees replaced on-site or mitigation fees paid to Houston Parks Board Tree Mitigation Bank.
Garland next steps
Houston next steps
Filing in Garland or Houston?
Capture an ISA TRAQ Level 1, 2, or 3 assessment in the field and export a municipality-ready PDF that fits each city's required report sections. Free, no account required.
Start a TRAQ assessment