Tree removal permit rules: Beaverton vs Gresham, Oregon

A side-by-side comparison drawn from each city's tree-protection ordinance. For the underlying full ordinance text, see the Beaverton ordinance page or the Gresham ordinance page.

Side-by-side comparison

Field Beaverton Gresham
Protected tree definition Significant tree: 10 inches DBH or greater. Heritage trees designated separately. Tree preservation required during development. Significant tree: 6 inches DBH or greater on development sites. Tree preservation standards apply during land use review. Heritage trees designated separately.
Heritage / landmark trees Heritage Tree designation for exceptional size, species, or community significance. Heritage trees designated for exceptional size, species, age, or historical significance.
Who can apply Property owner or authorized agent with arborist report Property owner or authorized agent with arborist report
Replacement ratio Based on retention percentage and mitigation standards Inch-for-inch caliper mitigation
Replacement details On-site replacement preferred; fee-in-lieu to tree fund when infeasible. On-site replacement preferred; fee-in-lieu to tree fund when infeasible.
Typical processing time Not documented 4-6 weeks
Permit fee Not documented Not documented
Permitting department Community Development Department Urban Design and Planning Department
Municipal code View ordinance → View ordinance →

How they differ

Which city has stricter heritage tree protections, Beaverton or Gresham?
Both Beaverton and Gresham maintain heritage / landmark tree designations. Beaverton: Heritage Tree designation for exceptional size, species, or community significance. Gresham: Heritage trees designated for exceptional size, species, age, or historical significance.
Where is a tree removal permit processed faster, Beaverton or Gresham?
Gresham publishes a typical processing time of 4-6 weeks. Beaverton does not publish a typical processing time, so confirm the current turnaround directly with Beaverton's permitting department.
Where are tree replacement obligations heavier, Beaverton or Gresham?
Beaverton requires a replacement ratio of Based on retention percentage and mitigation standards. Gresham requires a replacement ratio of Inch-for-inch caliper mitigation. Beaverton: On-site replacement preferred; fee-in-lieu to tree fund when infeasible. Gresham: On-site replacement preferred; fee-in-lieu to tree fund when infeasible.

Filing in Beaverton or Gresham?

Capture an ISA TRAQ Level 1, 2, or 3 assessment in the field and export a municipality-ready PDF that fits each city's required report sections. Free, no account required.

Start a TRAQ assessment