Tree removal permit rules: Durham vs Greensboro, North Carolina
A side-by-side comparison drawn from each city's tree-protection ordinance. For the underlying full ordinance text, see the Durham ordinance page or the Greensboro ordinance page.
Side-by-side comparison
| Field | Durham | Greensboro |
|---|---|---|
| Protected tree definition | Durham Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) §9.8 Tree Protection regulates significant trees and heritage trees on all non-single-family-residential development sites. Significant trees: ≥12 inches DBH for most species. Heritage trees: ≥24 inches DBH or any tree of exceptional size, age, or historical significance designated by the City/County Arborist. Historic Overlay District (HOD) and Neighborhood Protection Overlay (NPO) provisions add enhanced tree protection in regulated districts. Durham operates under a joint City-County planning framework so Durham County tree provisions also apply within city limits on qualifying sites. | Greensboro Land Development Ordinance (LDO) tree preservation standards govern tree preservation during site plan review for commercial, multi-family, institutional, and mixed-use development. Protected trees ≥10 inches DBH identified at site plan review require preservation or mitigation. Greensboro maintains a Champion Tree Registry (designated specimen trees) receiving enhanced protection. Public street trees regulated regardless of development category. |
| Heritage / landmark trees | Heritage trees: ≥24 inch DBH or any tree of exceptional size, age, or historical significance; enhanced mitigation required for removal. Historic Overlay District (HOD) Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) required for tree removal on regulated properties. | Champion trees and specimen trees designated by the City Arborist or listed on the Champion Tree Registry receive enhanced protection; removal requires demonstrated hardship, hazard, or approved site plan with enhanced mitigation. |
| Who can apply | Property owner, authorized agent, or licensed tree service; tree protection plans prepared by registered landscape architect or ISA Certified Arborist | Property owner, authorized agent, or licensed tree service; preservation plans prepared by registered landscape architect or ISA Certified Arborist |
| Replacement ratio | Inch-for-inch replacement for significant trees; enhanced ratios (typically 2:1 or greater) for heritage trees per UDO §9.8 | Inch-for-inch replacement for standard protected trees; enhanced ratios for champion/specimen trees per LDO tree preservation standards |
| Replacement details | On-site replacement preferred with approved native canopy species; in-lieu payment to the Durham Tree Mitigation Fund accepted when on-site replacement is infeasible. | On-site replacement preferred with approved native canopy species; in-lieu payment to the tree replacement fund accepted when on-site replacement is infeasible. |
| Typical processing time | 3-6 weeks for tree protection review as part of development submittal | 3-6 weeks for tree preservation review as part of site plan submittal |
| Permit fee | Not documented | Not documented |
| Permitting department | Durham City-County Planning Department / General Services Urban Forestry | Greensboro Planning Department / Parks and Recreation Urban Forestry |
| Municipal code | View ordinance → | View ordinance → |
How they differ
- Which city has stricter heritage tree protections, Durham or Greensboro?
- Both Durham and Greensboro maintain heritage / landmark tree designations. Durham: Heritage trees: ≥24 inch DBH or any tree of exceptional size, age, or historical significance; enhanced mitigation required for removal. Historic Overlay District (HOD) Certificate of Appropriateness… Greensboro: Champion trees and specimen trees designated by the City Arborist or listed on the Champion Tree Registry receive enhanced protection; removal requires demonstrated hardship, hazard, or approved site…
- Where is a tree removal permit processed faster, Durham or Greensboro?
- Durham publishes a typical processing time of 3-6 weeks for tree protection review as part of development submittal; Greensboro publishes 3-6 weeks for tree preservation review as part of site plan submittal. Compare each city's published timeline and plan removal accordingly — emergency-tree provisions may shorten the wait in either city.
- Where are tree replacement obligations heavier, Durham or Greensboro?
- Durham requires a replacement ratio of Inch-for-inch replacement for significant trees; enhanced ratios (typically 2:1 or greater) for heritage trees per UDO §9.8. Greensboro requires a replacement ratio of Inch-for-inch replacement for standard protected trees; enhanced ratios for champion/specimen trees per LDO tree preservation standards. Durham: On-site replacement preferred with approved native canopy species; in-lieu payment to the Durham Tree Mitigation Fund accepted when on-site replacement is infeasible. Greensboro: On-site replacement preferred with approved native canopy species; in-lieu payment to the tree replacement fund accepted when on-site replacement is infeasible.
Durham next steps
Greensboro next steps
Filing in Durham or Greensboro?
Capture an ISA TRAQ Level 1, 2, or 3 assessment in the field and export a municipality-ready PDF that fits each city's required report sections. Free, no account required.
Start a TRAQ assessment