Tree removal permit rules: Burbank vs Concord, California

A side-by-side comparison drawn from each city's tree-protection ordinance. For the underlying full ordinance text, see the Burbank ordinance page or the Concord ordinance page.

Side-by-side comparison

Field Burbank Concord
Protected tree definition Protected Tree: all street trees and trees on public property regardless of size; native trees (oaks, California sycamore, California bay) 6+ inches DBH on private property; Landmark and Heritage trees designated by City Council. Protected Tree: any tree 6+ inches DBH within the structural setback of creeks or streams, any native oak 6+ inches DBH city-wide, and heritage trees designated by Council. Street trees on public property are protected regardless of size.
Heritage / landmark trees Landmark Trees and Heritage Trees designated by City Council based on exceptional size, age, species rarity, historical association, aesthetic significance, or community value. Heritage Trees designated by Council for exceptional size, age, species rarity, historical significance, or community value; automatic designation for riparian trees meeting threshold in creek/stream corridors.
Who can apply Property owner, adjacent property owner (for parkway trees), or authorized agent with arborist report Property owner or authorized agent with ISA Certified Arborist report
Replacement ratio 1:1 minimum for street trees; 2:1 or higher for Landmark/Heritage trees 1:1 minimum; 2:1 for heritage trees or native oaks
Replacement details Replacement species from approved Parks and Recreation list; 15-gallon minimum container size. In-lieu fees to the Urban Forestry Fund when on-site replanting is infeasible. 15-gallon minimum replacement from approved native species list. In-lieu fees to the Tree Preservation Fund when on-site replanting is infeasible.
Typical processing time 4-6 weeks 4-6 weeks
Permit fee Not documented Not documented
Permitting department Parks and Recreation Department Community Development Department
Municipal code View ordinance → View ordinance →

How they differ

Which city has stricter heritage tree protections, Burbank or Concord?
Both Burbank and Concord maintain heritage / landmark tree designations. Burbank: Landmark Trees and Heritage Trees designated by City Council based on exceptional size, age, species rarity, historical association, aesthetic significance, or community value. Concord: Heritage Trees designated by Council for exceptional size, age, species rarity, historical significance, or community value; automatic designation for riparian trees meeting threshold in creek/stream…
Where is a tree removal permit processed faster, Burbank or Concord?
Burbank publishes a typical processing time of 4-6 weeks; Concord publishes 4-6 weeks. Compare each city's published timeline and plan removal accordingly — emergency-tree provisions may shorten the wait in either city.
Where are tree replacement obligations heavier, Burbank or Concord?
Burbank requires a replacement ratio of 1:1 minimum for street trees; 2:1 or higher for Landmark/Heritage trees. Concord requires a replacement ratio of 1:1 minimum; 2:1 for heritage trees or native oaks. Burbank: Replacement species from approved Parks and Recreation list; 15-gallon minimum container size. In-lieu fees to the Urban Forestry Fund when on-site replanting is infeasible. Concord: 15-gallon minimum replacement from approved native species list. In-lieu fees to the Tree Preservation Fund when on-site replanting is infeasible.

Filing in Burbank or Concord?

Capture an ISA TRAQ Level 1, 2, or 3 assessment in the field and export a municipality-ready PDF that fits each city's required report sections. Free, no account required.

Start a TRAQ assessment